|
|
||
|
Poet, teacher, and master of equivocation William Stobb discusses poets, poetry, and language without ever making a definitive claim. |
||
|
|
||
|
EPISODE 1, OCTOBER 10, 2006 |
||
Early Dean Young powered by ODEO I feel like it can be a back-handed compliment to praise a poet’s early work when that poet is crackling out new poems & poems & great books of poems like he’s locked into some hot circuit, ungrounded. Dean Young rules. I don’t mean that—it’s not about ruling, obviously. But I mean that Dean Young’s poems continue to be a gift to me. Consider the fucking great (can I use that word in this?) brilliant “True / False” poem from Elegy on Toy Piano. It’s a three-full-pager made up of 100 T/F questions by and about Dean Young. In some of these, he plays that familiar, tricked-up autobiography card that I never know what to make of, when he uses “Mary” and “Tony” as characters. Readers of Ruefle and Hoagland will recognize the games these three play with each others’ names and with seemingly autobiographical poems including each other and about each other. Hoagland’s “When Dean Young Talks About Wine” comes to mind and Ruefle’s “A Poem by Dean Young,” which she wrote but which appears in his book—and he’s got her back with “A Poem by Mary Ruefle” which he wrote but which appears in her book. Anyway, here’s some of “True / False” by Dean Young, from 2005’s Elegy on Toy Piano. 1. Usually my first answer is
correct. 50. Tony made a mistake
getting married. 61. Don’t let Mary drive. So, yes, these lines play the autobiography game, but that’s nothing, really. It’s gossip-slash-commentary-about-gossip and it’s interesting to that extent. And also I really like the writing of all three of those people, so I always hope they’re happy when I meet them in their poems. But it’s the poetry of it that’s killer. The transformation in that last one? #66? Where it transfers from pointy-headed theory discourse to an action image of crossing a stream—an action image with religion, yo: walking on water w/ out getting wet? That rules. I don’t mean that. It’s not about ruling. As I write this, I’ve learned that Press Assistant Sarah Roberts, at the University of Iowa’s Center for the Book has produced a 23-foot-long, accordion-folded print version of this poem, published by Inflorescence Press, which sounds magnificent to me. All of this has been my long-ass way of saying Dean Young’s new work is great. It’s on fire, you know, in all the ways you’d want to be on fire. Actually, Elegy’s not even Young’s most recent book—there’s one called Embryoyo that’s DUE any day. Ha ha. But I loved Dean Young’s early work at a time when I needed to learn to love stuff. The nights were long and cold back then, in Grand Forks North Dakota—that’s a shout-out to Grand Forks, by the way: is anybody out there? Of course you are. I lived in GF when I was 22 & that book came out and a few of us were into new poets. My friend Kevin Marzahl is great at reading poems and finding all manner of cool shit to look at, so I kind of got Dean Young as a gift from Kevin. I’d learn a lot from Kevin’s poems, too—his poem “Kiln” won a contest at The Southern Review right about then, when he was 23 or so. I couldn’t find it on the internet, but I’m told that text archives exist. I meant what I said about love, though. Maybe it comes easy to some people, but for me I have to learn it—this is sounding hokey, so I’m gonna leave it at that. Here’s a poem I loved called “Legend,” from 1992’s Beloved Infidel. Legend Someone
said lightning from a clear sky You’ve got to imagine a God
cutting off While Marley finally bowed to
radiation When we were young we watched
workers Last night I listened to the
early, one-track kept living like a thing in a jar, You know, that poem uses some conventions of
poetic speech that might now seem… what?… culturally enforced?… to a
poet as advanced as Dean Young. I mean, these days, Dean Young is
making dynamic moves on so many levels that this sustained
first-person narrative might seem naďve. But I admired the speaker
of those poems, & wanted to live like him. That guy in those
poems—Dean Young or not—was a friend to me. He knew interesting
stuff—he had apparently been a med student at one time and there was
one poem where he showed an open brain. Cool. He’d had a wide
variety of romantic and sexual relationships, knew something about
drugs, not to mention reggae (I mean, in “Legend,” that’s a good
analysis of the little bob-slash-groove of reggae dancing—I wanted
to analyze stuff like that!). That poetic speaker also had hip,
activist friends. Those poems seemed to want the world to be a good,
or at least better place. And the speaker of those poems was
possessed of this ability for vision. I wanted to absorb what I saw
like that speaker absorbed those spark-spurting workers in the
girders. I was learning from those poems how to see, I guess. |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Julie Carter is reading the poems featured. |